Google Adsense To End Video Units Feature



Google Adsense is all set to end video units feature from April end. The video units feature, through which publishers could show YouTube content and video ads on their pages, is now being eliminated by Google AdSense. Google has announced that the existing AdSense clients will have their feature eliminated by the end of April.

As for the new clients of the revenue sharing ad program, they will not be given the option to place video ads on their pages any more. However, publishers will still be able to display video content on their pages. For this, they will have to pull embed codes directly from YouTube.

The reason that Google gave for eliminating the video ads was that their performances was not up to the mark. Pre-rolls are much more common that videos, mainly because figuring out a sustainable ad model for the latter is much more difficult. However, the problem with video ads might not concern the whole ad unit, rather the underlying content only. Since brand advertisers rarely want their names to be associated with random words spoken in videos, the concept of video ads seemed to be faulty.

It is being believed that the latest announcement by Google, in relation to the video ads, is just another step towards laying off the programs in AdSense. Only sometime back, the American conglomerate had discontinued its Google Radio Ads. It was also looking to sell off its Google Radio Automation software business, only a month after it had decided to bail on selling print ads. It was only a matter of time before Google pulled the plug on AdSense and it seems that the right time has come now!

Appeals Court Rules Against Google On Keyword Ads



"The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google in Rescuecom v. Google (PDF), a trademark infringement lawsuit over Google's keyword advertising practices. The court said: 'The Complaint's allegations that Google's recommendation and sale of Rescuecom's mark to Google's advertisers, so as to trigger the appearance of their advertisements and links in a manner likely to cause consumer confusion when a Google user launches a search of Rescuecom's trademark, properly alleges a claim under the Lanham Act.' While this result hampers Google's ability to end trademark lawsuits early, the case is still at an early stage and Google could still win."

Can Google Make Any Money with Twitter?



Twitter, a microblogging service in which millions of people post brief text messages, has emerged as the custodian of a valuable online index of real-time facts, comments, musings and announcements, information that is clearly valuable for Google's search engine index.

Google may be in late-stage negotiations to acquire Twitter, according to published online reports. Facebook already made a bid for Twitter in 2008. Twitter has focused in recent weeks on strengthening its search features, in what was originally thought as a bid to make it a more competitive entity against Google and other search-engine players. But if Google were to acquire Twitter, how would that benefit Google?



Google may acquire Twitter, according to reports circulating online, but how would it benefit from such an acquisition?

On TechCrunch, Michael Arrington wrote that "two separate people close to the negotiations" had told him that Google was jockeying to acquire the microblogging site, which lets users post "tweets" of up to 140 characters.

Twitter previously declined a buyout by Facebook in 2008. No valuation has been publicly announced for a potential Google deal.

This would be Twitter co-founder Biz Stone’s second deal with Google; he was part of the team behind Blogger, which the search-engine giant bought in February 2003.

According to analysts, Twitter offers potential real value to any company seeking to acquire it.

"Twitter's value is in its content, growing by 6 million tweets per day," Jeffrey Mann, an analyst at Gartner, said in an e-mail. "Twitter is attractive because it has built a service that attracts this much volume, creating a constantly growing, twitching, seething real-time source of comments, news and opinions.

"The culture and ambitions of Twitter and Google match," Mann added. "Now is the time for Twitter to sell. It is at the top of its hype range now. Monetizing on its own would be a long, hard slog."

Twitter has been taking steps to make its search feature more robust, starting with the March 6 transfer of its search bar from search.twitter.com onto its main site. A "Trends" menu, where users could see the most talked-about subjects among Twitter users, was integrated into the search function at the time.

At the time, the thinking was that such steps would allow Twitter to seize a larger share of online revenue dollars and thus offer more powerful competition to Google. However, if Google acquires the company, then Twitter’s newfound strengths only contribute to Google’s already substantial assets—and eliminate a potential source of future competition.

"I think Google is starting to see the beginning of a threat to its dominance of search coming from the microbloggers." John Byrne, an analyst at TBRI, said in an e-mail. "Twitter has its own search engine, which is great for getting up-to-the-minute tweets on any topic, and Google does not have a significant presence in microblogging as part of its search index. If people start using Twitter to search, that would come at the expense of Google."

When it comes to a potential Google-Twitter deal, Byrne said, “What I would expect is to see two affiliations: a deal in which Twitter’s search results are included in Google’s search results, and a deal in which Google starts posting search-based ads on Twitter’s search site.

"The first would allow Google to improve its search results significantly and expand Twitter’s reach significantly," he added. "Both affiliations would allow Twitter to see significant revenue-sharing deals with Google that would, for the first time, allow it to monetize the significant momentum it has achieved in microblogging."

Twitter had already been exploring alternate ways to aggressively monetize itself, starting with the March 23 launch of ExecTweets, a site sponsored by Microsoft that clustered the microblogging missives of some of the nation’s most prominent executives. In addition, it announced business- and enterprise-centric plans to launch paid commercial accounts sometime in 2009.

Should a Twitter acquisition take place, any such revenue-generating features will likely contribute to Google’s bottom line, as well.

A Google-Twitter acquisition would mark the second major IT deal in this period; IBM and Sun Microsystems are reportedly finishing negotiations for a mega-buyout, with IBM acquiring Sun for as much as $6.5 billion in cash. The deal would allow IBM to position itself as the 800-pound gorilla with regard to open-source Linux and Java software for Web application development, data storage, government systems and telecommunications.

Sites For Smarter Money Management



Apparently, I am one of the few people who use the personal finance app Quicken the way its geek programmers intended: I use it to record my every financial transaction (except small cash purchases), every investment activity, and every penny I pay on interest for my mortgage into it. For some reason, I'm obsessive about keeping track of my money. My one concession to practicality and time savings in recent years: I no longer break out what I spend on sales tax for retail transactions.

But compulsive behavior isn’t by itself smart money management. In fact, I'm doing things all wrong. I've got the details but I don't act on them. I can see where my money is going, but that's all I really do with the information: watch my money go.

Current Web-based personal finance apps make it much easier to do things right. They don't just collect your financial transaction data, they analyze it. They make suggestions. And until your finances get Madoff-complicated, they do a good job at giving you a simple picture of what's going on with your money. Simple enough that you can act on the information in smart ways.

Like most online personal finance sites, Mint will log on to your bank and investment accounts, download your data, and show you exactly what you’re spending money on. It also does a fairly good job of categorizing your transactions. It will tell you, for example, what you’re spending on gas every month, even if you buy gas from different stations.

Mint's clever trick is that it lets you compare you spending habits with other people in your location (city or state). If you see that you're spending more than most people on utilities, for example, that may help prod you to lower your energy use. It's a limited feature (you can't filter out people who have bigger or smaller families than you, for example) but it still provides very useful data.

The service also looks at the fees and interest associated with your bank and credit accounts, and gives you customized advertisements showing how much you would save if you switched to another bark or card. Again, the data behind the feature is limited, but it's enough to let you know when you're getting fleeced by your financial institution.


Wesabe, like Mint, gives you specific ways to save money, but its tips aren't from advertisers. Rather, it compares how much you spend per transaction at a particular vendor, like a grocery store or fast-food restaurant, and then suggests that next time you're thinking of going to that establishment, you try a lower-priced option in the same category, based on data from other users. The service also identifies recurring fees and subscriptions and will offer them up to you as optional "cutbacks," reminding you as you get closer to the next time the fee is paid that you might want to terminate the service.

Wesabe also lets you select from a menu of financial goals -- both savings and other, such as "stop paying overdrafts" -- and it tracks your progress towards them. Wesabe has a community of users in online forums on the site, so as you try to grapple with the system's advice you can talk with other users in similar situations.

Intuit, which makes Quicken, also has an online version, Quicken Online. Its trick is its clear and simple way of telling you about your cash position. It tells you how much money you have left to spend until your next paycheck, and when that will be. It also helps you track simple goals, like saving for a vacation or car down payment. Quicken Online does far less than Quicken the software app, but it's also much simpler. It's also free.



Thrive is the stern nanny of personal finance sites. It evaluates your financial habits and gives you three achievable goals about them, like taking 10 percent less cash out of the bank machine each month. Make that goal, and it's replaced with another. I hate this site. Because it's right.

Other sites in this vein include Geezeo, which has a very strong community angle, including a section for financial "confessions." There's also Buxfer, which has the neat feature of helping you settle shared bills, like rent and phone; it's great if you have roommates.

None of the sites let you pay bills or actually execute financial transactions through them, as the financial apps Quicken and Microsoft Money do. However, since most bank sites now have bill-pay features, that's not a great loss. Any money you spend on a bank site will get picked up when it's recorded by the sites covered here.

One warning: If you read my last column, you know that there is a risk to using online resources. And when you're talking about online banking, that risk is material. You have to give your bank accounts' user IDs and passwords to these sites to use them so they can gather data for you. That is a risk. None of these sites has had a breach and let private customer information into the wrong hands, and they all depend on maintaining their users' trust. Each company's CEO will tell you that their sites are virtually un-hackable, and that even if someone got your password on the service, all they could do is see your transactions -- remember, these sites don't let you actually move money.

If, however, one of these services was hacked and the bad guys got your stored bank passwords out of it, well, that would be financially catastrophic. The site spokespeople will tell you that's not possible. They're probably close enough to right that it doesn't matter. But there is no such thing as zero risk when it comes to computer security.

All of these sites are free, and you could, theoretically, use them all. I wouldn't recommend that, but it could be an interesting exercise. Personally, I like the advice from Wesabe and Thrive. But Mint collects data from more sources, like investment accounts, so it gives you a more complete financial picture.

For finding ways to be smarter about money, all of these sites are better than one of the old-school software-based financial products, and definitely superior to the most common personal financial management system -- guesswork.


By Rafe Needleman

Make money off your e-waste



Sure, you already know you should recycle your e-waste — and that every week, a new company seems to come out with its own recycling program.

But with all the different take-back programs, sell-back programs, rebate programs, and the like, how's one supposed to know which method to go with — or better yet, which methods are actually profitable for the would-be environmentalist? Because while both Best Buy and Office Depot will charge you about $10 to recycle your laptop, the former offsets that cost by giving you a $10 gift certificate and the latter doesn't. Other sites, like Collective Good (http://collectivegood.tradeups.com/), might in fact pay you for the privilege of taking your unwanted laptop off your hands. Others might offer to donate the proceeds of your recycled product to your favorite charity. What's a do-gooder to do?

All these programs will inevitably vary for you in terms of locations, convenience, restrictions, etc. — which is why some environmentalists find their attempts to e-cycle using only sustainable transportation and packaging an all-day endeavor.

PC Mag has just published The Electronics Recycling Superguide (www.pcmag.com/ article2/0,2817,2341907,00. asp).

This article details the e-waste recycling programs offered by the major electronics manufacturers and a list of seven cash-back Web sites that might pay you to send them your e-waste.